Have you ever had to face a challenge in between caring for a person versus caring for your relationship with him or her? I think that if you haven’t, will certainly to have to confront this difficulty ultimately in your leadership journey. The leadership lesson of caring for your subordinates as opposed to caring for your relationship with them will be discussed right here with the intention to gear you up in preparation for the day you have to make this choice.
Enable me to recount my 1st encounter with this difficulty. It was proper at the starting of my leadership journey, exactly where I very first was 1st entrusted with a team in the security line. My instant predecessor who filled this position, Bennett, was rather mild in character and chose to play the ‘nice guy’. As he cared tremendously about the close relationship he had with his team, Bennett refused to make hard calls that will dissatisfy the members and potentially jeopardize their relationship. He was blinded by the affection he had with his colleagues, and this resulted in him massively compromising perform standards. Bennett was so incapable of action that even when the team members came to him to redress their grievances with other members, he would leave them to resolve their personal troubles as taking action would potentially mean upsetting certain members.
See the challenge right here? By getting a ‘Yes-man’, Bennett properly compromised the standards of operate of his team as he’d rather give in to the team’s requests than hold firm to his set standards. This too at some point led to additional repercussions as the team went down a slippery slope of continual declining standards. Bennett as well disposed of his authority as the leader when his subordinates decided that he was incapable of action and would not be of support redressing their grievances. In search of absolutely nothing but to guard relationships, Bennett was as well unwilling to disagree with his peers and superiors, resulting in various occasions exactly where there had been no one particular to stand up for his subordinates.
So as Bennett’s successor, I was placed in a challenging position on no matter if to continue selling my subordinates out and compromising standards, or stand up for my subordinates but threat hurting our relationship. Naturally, soon after becoming used to Bennett’s leadership, or lack of it, my team had been watching my directions closely, expecting me to stick to Bennett’s footsteps, being a friendly but powerless leader. It would be uncomplicated for me to continue this legacy and snowball the troubles to my successor in time to come, as the team surely would delight in a different simple going boss with low standards and not blame me for that. What, nevertheless, spurred me to make the proper selection as opposed to the straightforward a single was my belief that if I really cared for my subordinates, I would NOT shortchange them of an efficient and upright leader, giving them less than they deserve, even if it indicates getting them to dislike me.
As such, I started to make some hard choices to end unrightful practices, such as biasness towards a minority couple of members and bullying less outspoken members into taking a bigger share of duty. I preached meritocracy and fairness, as opposed to the ‘relationship-solves-all-complications’ mindset. Initial, I was resented for my selection, as various members felt that I was out to make life difficult for everybody. Even so, as time passed, my sincerity showed as the team started to see how I would not compromise my standards and stood up for each member of the team, suitable to the extremely end.
Moral of the story? Caring for relationships more than Folks could make your team like you, but they surely would not respect you as their leader. A leader who cares for relationship more than Folks is, in reality, selfish as he’d rather delight in the recognition vote than be there for these who want him. In the lengthy run, he’s certain to loose his authority and grow to be powerless as a leader, and when he lastly decides that sufficient is sufficient, it’d be way too late.
If you ever face such a scenario, bear in mind that your subordinates, who willingly adhere to your leadership, deserves none but the very best from you, may well your very good judgment bring success to your team constantly.